"An Insult to Jehovah"

As I said previously, I came to understand the Bible support of observing God's Holy Days when I set about to disprove them! You can't make this radical change in belief without constantly being exposed to the naysayers, the ones who thought just like I thought not too long ago. What I had relied on was hearsay and tradition. Well, it turns out that hearsay and tradition are not very reliable.

One person who is frequently invited to speak against feast-keeping in Adventist circles is the author of Feast Keeping and the Faithful. This man is a well-spoken and outwardly kind man, but in reading his book, I find a lack of intellectual honesty. It seems that he said to himself, "What quotes can I find that will disprove feast keeping?" rather than, "What does the inspired Word of God have to say on this topic?" Though going out to prove just that point took me in the opposite direction, in order to have growth, a person's mind must be open to accepting that their preconceived ideas may need adjusting. That is very hard for most of us.

Here are a couple of examples of his lack of intellectual honesty:

1.  He pairs feast-keepers with the so-called lunar sabbath at almost every opportunity. Of course the lunar sabbath is neither biblical nor logical, but when so pairing the two together makes it sound like all feast keepers subscribe to the lunar sabbath. He knows this is not true, because he has spent time with feast keepers who adamantly oppose the lunar sabbath.

2. He wrote:

Over time, I was able to do some careful biblical research into every significant argument put forward by those who promote or observe these festivals. In brief, my findings are as follows:

1) These feast days have ALL been fulfilled in and by Jesus Christ. And to continue to keep these festivals is actually an “insult to Jehovah” (RH, June 14, 1898), according to the inspired Spirit of Prophecy.

I have heard this "insult to Jehovah" claim repeatedly. The following is a portion of the Ellen G. White article he quoted above:

In this ordinance [foot washing], Christ discharged his disciples from the cares and burdens of the ancient Jewish obligations in rites and ceremonies. These no longer possessed any virtue; for type was meeting antitype in himself, the authority and foundation of all Jewish ordinances that pointed to him as the great and only efficacious offering for the sins of the world. He gave this simple ordinance that it might be a special season when he himself would always be present, to lead all participating in it to feel the pulse of their own conscience, to awaken them to an understanding of the lessons symbolized, to revive their memory, to convict of sin, and to receive their penitential repentance. He would teach them that brother is not to exalt himself above brother, that the dangers of disunion and strife shall be seen and appreciated; for the health and holy activity of the soul are involved.

This ordinance does not speak so largely to man's intellectual capacity as to his heart. His moral and spiritual nature needs it. If his disciples had not needed this, it would not have been left for them as Christ's last established ordinance in connection with, and including, the last supper. It was Christ's desire to leave to his disciples an ordinance that would do for them the very thing they needed,—that would serve to disentangle them from the rites and ceremonies which they had hitherto engaged in as essential, and which the reception of the gospel made no longer of any force. To continue these rites would be an insult to Jehovah. Eating of the body, and drinking of the blood, of Christ, not merely at the sacramental service, but daily partaking of the bread of life to satisfy the soul's hunger, would be in receiving his word and doing his will. RH June 14, 1898

The author of Feast Keeping and the Faithful does not seem to notice -- but how could he not notice? He is a scholar! -- that the quote above, and others like it, all refer to the rites and ceremonies, observed by none of the feast keepers that he finds fault with, as he knows through association with them.

These two examples reveal to me how he uses faulty reasoning and inaccurate statements in order to to paint with a black brush those who observe God's Holy Days.

The rites and ceremonies that pointed forward to Jesus and His sacrifice for us all had to do with the Temple sacrificial system, and that came to an end when He became our Passover. But his followers continued to gather together on His Holy Days, forsaking the rites and ceremonies of the past, but following His injunction to have "an holy convocation" at His Appointed Times. When He told His disciples that he would not partake of the fruit of the vine until "that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom," He may have been referring to a kingdom-celebrated Passover.

When I think of the deeper meanings of Passover, how it wasn't just a celebration of past deliverance, not only a former pointing forward to of Jesus' final blow to Satan on the cross, but a current looking forward to our final deliverance from this earthly Egypt and our escape from the evil of this earth, I am so thankful that I have come to understand the plan of salvation and how it is laid out so clearly through the annual cycle of God's Holy Days! What a blessing this has been to my life!